Report an error
Gasoline pumped in Latvia correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Andrea | r=0.96 | 31yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Maurice | r=0.96 | 31yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Daniel | r=0.96 | 31yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Lamont | r=0.96 | 31yrs | No |
Arson in Ohio | r=0.94 | 31yrs | No |
Google searches for 'Britney Spears' | r=0.93 | 15yrs | No |
Robberies in Nevada | r=0.9 | 31yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Alison | r=0.9 | 31yrs | No |
The number of movies Viggo Mortensen appeared in | r=0.59 | 31yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Latvia also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)