Report an error
Gasoline pumped in Kosovo correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Popularity of the first name Kiera | r=0.97 | 14yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Lizbeth | r=0.97 | 14yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Ty | r=0.97 | 14yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Joel | r=0.96 | 14yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Javon | r=0.96 | 14yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Gregorio | r=0.96 | 14yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Andy | r=0.94 | 14yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Sam | r=0.92 | 14yrs | No |
| Number of games won by Detroit Red Wings in NHL season | r=0.85 | 14yrs | No |
| xkcd comics published about literature | r=0.67 | 14yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Kosovo also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)