Report an error
Jet fuel used in Kazakhstan correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of hairdressers, hairstylists, and cosmetologists in Tennessee | r=0.91 | 19yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'loss' meme | r=0.89 | 15yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'weird flex but ok' meme | r=0.87 | 16yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'floss dance' meme | r=0.85 | 16yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme | r=0.84 | 16yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the 'hard pills to swallow' meme | r=0.83 | 16yrs | Yes! |
Jet fuel used in Kazakhstan also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)