Report an error
Kerosene used in Japan correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
GMO use in corn grown in South Dakota | r=0.96 | 23yrs | No |
Ice cream consumption | r=0.95 | 32yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Raul | r=0.95 | 43yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Arturo | r=0.93 | 43yrs | No |
Robberies in Arizona | r=0.91 | 38yrs | No |
Air pollution in Nashville | r=0.8 | 43yrs | Yes! |
Air pollution in Longview, Texas | r=0.78 | 43yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Anton | r=0.68 | 43yrs | No |
Air pollution in Fond du Lac, Wisconsin | r=0.68 | 39yrs | Yes! |
Air pollution in Oklahoma City | r=0.63 | 43yrs | Yes! |
Kerosene used in Japan also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)