Report an error
Gasoline pumped in Denmark correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
GMO use in cotton | r=0.97 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Emily | r=0.96 | 43yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Brendan | r=0.95 | 43yrs | No |
The marriage rate in Arkansas | r=0.94 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Anna | r=0.93 | 43yrs | No |
Google searches for 'report UFO sighting' | r=0.92 | 19yrs | No |
Air pollution in Berlin, New Hampshire | r=0.84 | 42yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Anton | r=0.63 | 43yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Denmark also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)