Report an error
Popularity of the first name Louis correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Solar power generated in Kenya | r=0.98 | 12yrs | No |
| Associates degrees awarded in Liberal arts | r=0.97 | 11yrs | No |
| The number of truck drivers in New York | r=0.97 | 13yrs | No |
| The number of cashiers in North Carolina | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
| The number of truck drivers in Pennsylvania | r=0.96 | 13yrs | No |
| Total likes of The Game Theorists YouTube videos | r=0.96 | 14yrs | No |
| The number of authors in Utah | r=0.95 | 20yrs | No |
| The average number of likes on The Game Theorists YouTube videos | r=0.95 | 14yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'reddit' | r=0.95 | 15yrs | No |
| The average number of likes on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos | r=0.91 | 16yrs | No |
| US GDP per capita | r=0.91 | 14yrs | No |
| Comcast's stock price (CMCSA) | r=0.9 | 21yrs | No |
| Customer satisfaction with Delta Airlines | r=0.88 | 28yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Louis also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)