Report an error
Popularity of the first name Andy correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of computer programmers in Florida | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
Google searches for 'desktop background' | r=0.97 | 16yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Ireland | r=0.96 | 43yrs | No |
GMO use in cotton in Texas | r=0.95 | 23yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Kosovo | r=0.94 | 14yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Greece | r=0.93 | 43yrs | No |
Fossil fuel use in Czechia | r=0.91 | 29yrs | No |
Average number of comments on SciShow Space YouTube videos | r=0.91 | 9yrs | No |
Arson in Idaho | r=0.9 | 22yrs | No |
The marriage rate in Louisiana | r=0.86 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Andy also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)