Report an error
Popularity of the first name Aubrey correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| The number of orderlies in Tennessee | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
| Master's degrees awarded in linguistics | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
| Fossil fuel use in British Virgin Islands | r=0.97 | 42yrs | No |
| The number of orderlies in Texas | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in North Carolina | r=0.95 | 47yrs | No |
| Number of internet users | r=0.95 | 24yrs | No |
| The price of gold | r=0.95 | 40yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in Tennessee | r=0.91 | 47yrs | No |
| Total number of live births in Australia | r=0.9 | 48yrs | No |
| Annual count of part-time employees in the United States | r=0.89 | 33yrs | No |
| The number of transportation inspectors in Delaware | r=0.88 | 16yrs | Yes! |
| Exxon Mobil's stock price (XOM) | r=0.88 | 21yrs | Yes! |
| Justin Upton's yearly run total | r=0.84 | 16yrs | Yes! |
| Popularity of the 'y u no' meme | r=0.75 | 17yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'batman' | r=0.72 | 19yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Aubrey also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)