Report an error
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Bahrain correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of wastewater treatment plant operators in New York | r=0.94 | 12yrs | No |
Mizuho Financial Group's stock price (MFG) | r=0.86 | 15yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the 'florida man' meme | r=0.85 | 14yrs | No |
xkcd comics published about statistics | r=0.78 | 15yrs | Yes! |
The number of security and fire alarm systems installers in New Mexico | r=0.63 | 19yrs | Yes! |
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Bahrain also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)