Report an error
Petroluem consumption in Australia correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Average milk produced per cow in the US | r=0.97 | 43yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Olivia | r=0.97 | 43yrs | No |
Annual count of part-time employees in the United States | r=0.96 | 33yrs | No |
Yogurt consumption | r=0.96 | 32yrs | No |
Google searches for 'best schools' | r=0.94 | 19yrs | No |
Google searches for 'movie theater showtimes' | r=0.93 | 19yrs | No |
Budget for largest movie production | r=0.9 | 43yrs | No |
The number of set and exhibit designers in New Mexico | r=0.74 | 19yrs | No |
Petroluem consumption in Australia also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)