Report an error
Popularity of the first name Diego correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Number of edits to the Wikipedia article for Thanksgiving | r=0.95 | 16yrs | No |
Fossil fuel use in Spain | r=0.95 | 42yrs | No |
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Lithuania | r=0.92 | 31yrs | No |
Google searches for 'Britney Spears' | r=0.91 | 15yrs | No |
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Missouri | r=0.91 | 12yrs | Yes! |
Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs | r=0.91 | 37yrs | No |
Ticket sales for Los Angeles Angels games | r=0.7 | 45yrs | No |
USA Population | r=0.69 | 48yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Diego also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)