Report an error
Electricity generation in United Kingdom correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Caleb | r=0.98 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Hailey | r=0.97 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Bryce | r=0.96 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Gage | r=0.96 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Dayton | r=0.96 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Makayla | r=0.95 | 42yrs | No |
Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins | r=0.94 | 34yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Maggie | r=0.94 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Jaylin | r=0.93 | 40yrs | No |
The divorce rate in Oklahoma | r=0.93 | 18yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Pablo | r=0.92 | 42yrs | No |
The distance between Uranus and the Sun | r=0.92 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Halle | r=0.91 | 42yrs | No |
Google searches for 'oprah winfrey' | r=0.91 | 18yrs | No |
Air pollution in Terre Haute, Indiana | r=0.81 | 41yrs | Yes! |
Electricity generation in United Kingdom also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)