Report an error
Wind power generated in Sweden correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Beau | r=0.99 | 39yrs | No |
The Walt Disney Company's stock price (DIS) | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how to go to space' | r=0.98 | 18yrs | No |
The number of Breweries in the United States | r=0.97 | 32yrs | Yes! |
The Hershey Company's stock price (HSY) | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
Butter consumption | r=0.95 | 32yrs | Yes! |
Air pollution in Boise City | r=0.61 | 39yrs | No |
Wind power generated in Sweden also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)