Report an error
Solar power generated in Sudan correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Google searches for 'cold shower' | r=0.98 | 13yrs | Yes! |
eBay Inc.'s stock price (EBAY) | r=0.97 | 13yrs | No |
US Bottled Water Consumption per Person | r=0.97 | 13yrs | Yes! |
SAP SE's stock price (SAP) | r=0.96 | 13yrs | No |
Verizon Communications' stock price (VZ) | r=0.95 | 13yrs | No |
Butter consumption | r=0.95 | 13yrs | Yes! |
The number of film and video editors in Connecticut | r=0.95 | 12yrs | Yes! |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Psychology | r=0.89 | 10yrs | No |
US household spending on vehicle purchaes | r=0.87 | 13yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Sudan also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)