Report an error
Wind power generated in South Africa correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Master's degrees awarded in Parks & Recreation | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA | r=0.98 | 19yrs | Yes! |
American cheese consumption | r=0.98 | 19yrs | No |
Google searches for 'sushi near me' | r=0.98 | 18yrs | Yes! |
The number of Breweries in the United States | r=0.98 | 19yrs | No |
Google searches for 'dollar store near me' | r=0.98 | 18yrs | Yes! |
American-type cheese consumption | r=0.98 | 19yrs | No |
Milk-fat consumption | r=0.96 | 19yrs | No |
Google's Annual Global Revenue | r=0.95 | 19yrs | No |
Wind power generated in South Africa also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)