Report an error
Biomass power generated in Sierra Leone correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Air pollution in Holland, Michigan | r=1 | 8yrs | No |
Air pollution in Atlantic City, New Jersey | r=1 | 8yrs | No |
Number of times a donut appears in a Garfield comic strip | r=1 | 8yrs | No |
Google searches for 'where do birds go when it rains' | r=0.99 | 8yrs | No |
The number of chemists in Delaware | r=0.99 | 6yrs | No |
How cool Matt Parker's YouTube video titles are | r=0.94 | 8yrs | No |
Arson in North Dakota | r=0.93 | 8yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Elsa | r=0.93 | 8yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'doge' meme | r=0.92 | 8yrs | No |
Boston Celtics' NBA season loss count | r=0.86 | 8yrs | No |
The number of movies Eva Green appeared in | r=0.85 | 8yrs | No |
Freezing temperatures in Austin | r=0.74 | 8yrs | No |
Snowfall in Washington, D.C. | r=0.71 | 8yrs | No |
Krispy Kreme Doughnuts store count in the US | r=-0.99 | 8yrs | No |
Biomass power generated in Sierra Leone also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)