Report an error
Wind power generated in Serbia correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of transportation workers in Idaho | r=1 | 9yrs | No |
The number of fire inspectors in Florida | r=0.99 | 9yrs | No |
The number of transportation security screeners in South Dakota | r=0.99 | 9yrs | No |
The number of fast food cooks in Iowa | r=0.96 | 9yrs | No |
Air pollution in Nashville | r=0.94 | 6yrs | No |
The number of amusement park attendants in Montana | r=0.94 | 9yrs | No |
Ford Motor Company's stock price (F) | r=-0.91 | 9yrs | No |
Wind power generated in Serbia also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)