Report an error
Solar power generated in Romania correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
US household spending on health insurance | r=0.97 | 13yrs | No |
Google searches for 'spurious correlations' | r=0.97 | 13yrs | No |
Google searches for 'male pattern baldness' | r=0.95 | 13yrs | No |
The number of mathematicians in Texas | r=0.92 | 11yrs | No |
The distance between Uranus and Jupiter | r=0.91 | 13yrs | No |
US consumption of imported cheese that did not come from cows | r=0.88 | 13yrs | No |
How 'hip and with it' Numberphile YouTube video titles are | r=0.74 | 11yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Romania also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)