Report an error
Biomass power generated in Poland correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Stella | r=0.98 | 42yrs | Yes! |
London Gold Prices | r=0.95 | 33yrs | No |
The price of gold | r=0.95 | 35yrs | No |
The number of college history teachers in Texas | r=0.94 | 19yrs | No |
Butter consumption | r=0.92 | 32yrs | Yes! |
Italian-type cheese consumption | r=0.91 | 27yrs | No |
The number of special education teachers in District of Columbia | r=0.91 | 10yrs | No |
The distance between Neptune and Uranus | r=0.91 | 42yrs | No |
Biomass power generated in Poland also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)