Report an error
Wind power generated in Poland correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Popularity of the first name Eleanor | r=0.99 | 27yrs | Yes! |
| Popularity of the first name Ezra | r=0.99 | 27yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Aurora | r=0.99 | 27yrs | Yes! |
| Dollar Tree's stock price (DLTR) | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
| US Wind Power Generation Capacity | r=0.98 | 22yrs | No |
| The number of Breweries in the United States | r=0.98 | 27yrs | No |
| Number of websites on the internet | r=0.97 | 24yrs | Yes! |
| Google searches for 'tummy ache' | r=0.97 | 18yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'instagram' | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
| US milk fat used to produce cheese (excluding cottage cheese) | r=0.96 | 22yrs | No |
| The Walt Disney Company's stock price (DIS) | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
| Annual US household spending on fresh vegetables | r=0.95 | 22yrs | No |
| Global Rice Consumption | r=0.95 | 13yrs | No |
Wind power generated in Poland also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)