Report an error
Popularity of the first name Harrison correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Biogen's stock price (BIIB) | r=0.98 | 21yrs | No |
| US Annual Tax Revenue | r=0.96 | 47yrs | No |
| Electricity generation in Colombia | r=0.95 | 42yrs | No |
| USA Population | r=0.94 | 48yrs | No |
| Average milk produced per cow in the US | r=0.93 | 43yrs | No |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb's stock price (BMY) | r=0.92 | 21yrs | Yes! |
| Popularity of the 'kermit' meme | r=0.91 | 17yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in New Mexico | r=0.87 | 47yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'who is donald trump' | r=0.69 | 19yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Harrison also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)