Report an error
Biomass power generated in Latvia correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Physical sciences | r=0.99 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'cat memes' | r=0.97 | 18yrs | Yes! |
Portion of all US dairy skim-solids allocated to the production of dry milk products (net) | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'drake' meme | r=0.96 | 16yrs | No |
The distance between Saturn and the Sun | r=0.93 | 21yrs | No |
Average number of comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos | r=0.86 | 13yrs | No |
Biomass power generated in Latvia also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)