Report an error
Wind power generated in Latvia correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Air quality in Warsaw, Indiana | r=0.98 | 8yrs | Yes! |
Number of Lawyers in the United States | r=0.95 | 26yrs | Yes! |
Butter consumption | r=0.93 | 26yrs | Yes! |
How 'hip and with it' Numberphile YouTube video titles are | r=0.9 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'funny cat videos' | r=0.82 | 18yrs | No |
Air quality in Laramie, Wyoming | r=0.47 | 26yrs | No |
Wind power generated in Latvia also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)