Report an error
Biomass power generated in Kazakhstan correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Google searches for 'i have a headache' | r=1 | 9yrs | No |
Average number of comments on MrBeast's YouTube videos | r=0.98 | 9yrs | No |
The Coca-Cola Company's stock price (KO) | r=0.97 | 9yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how to move to europe' | r=0.96 | 9yrs | No |
The distance between Mars and Venus | r=0.49 | 9yrs | No |
Biomass power generated in Kazakhstan also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)