Report an error
Wind power generated in Kazakhstan correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Master's degrees awarded in Military technologies | r=1 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'roblox' | r=0.99 | 14yrs | Yes! |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in information sciences | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
Eli Lilly and Company's stock price (LLY) | r=0.97 | 16yrs | No |
Google searches for 'why do i have a migraine' | r=0.97 | 16yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on beef | r=0.96 | 16yrs | No |
Wind power generated in Kazakhstan also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)