Report an error
Biomass power generated in Japan correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Average length of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos | r=1 | 8yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on other household products | r=0.96 | 22yrs | No |
American Tower's stock price (AMT) | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
Google searches for 'no cap' | r=0.96 | 18yrs | No |
Google's Advertising Revenue | r=0.95 | 21yrs | No |
Google's Annual Global Revenue | r=0.95 | 20yrs | No |
Biomass power generated in Japan also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)