Report an error
Electricity generation in Italy correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Israel | r=0.98 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Maya | r=0.97 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Isaac | r=0.97 | 42yrs | No |
The distance between Uranus and Mercury | r=0.96 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Emma | r=0.96 | 42yrs | No |
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Delaware | r=0.93 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Yogurt consumption | r=0.87 | 32yrs | No |
US Annual Tax Revenue | r=0.87 | 42yrs | No |
The number of movies Johnny Depp appeared in | r=0.71 | 38yrs | No |
The number of movies Hugh Jackman appeared in | r=0.55 | 27yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Italy also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)