Report an error
Fossil fuel use in India correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Number of internet users | r=0.99 | 24yrs | No |
GMO use in cotton in Texas | r=0.98 | 22yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Cecilia | r=0.98 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Kane | r=0.97 | 42yrs | No |
Colgate-Palmolive Company's stock price (CL) | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables | r=0.96 | 22yrs | No |
Votes for Democratic Senators in Washington | r=0.91 | 14yrs | No |
Fossil fuel use in India also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)