Report an error
Solar power generated in Hungary correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Maeve | r=0.99 | 14yrs | Yes! |
Microsoft's stock price (MSFT) | r=0.99 | 14yrs | No |
Lululemon's stock price (LULU) | r=0.98 | 14yrs | No |
Netflix's stock price (NFLX) | r=0.98 | 14yrs | No |
Google searches for 'do vaccines work' | r=0.97 | 14yrs | No |
Advanced Micro Devices' stock price (AMD) | r=0.97 | 14yrs | No |
The number of mechanical engineers in Alabama | r=0.87 | 14yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Hungary also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)