Report an error
Solar power generated in Honduras correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Milk-fat consumption | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
The number of insurance claims adjusters in North Carolina | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
Google searches for 'smol' | r=0.97 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Internet Access Rate among US Citizens | r=0.97 | 10yrs | Yes! |
The number of judges in New Mexico | r=0.95 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Ticket sales for Houston Astros games | r=0.94 | 8yrs | No |
Global Permanent Nuclear Reactor Shutdowns | r=0.66 | 10yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Honduras also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)