Report an error
Solar power generated in Ghana correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Average length of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos | r=0.98 | 8yrs | No |
US Tree Nut Consumption per Person | r=0.98 | 9yrs | No |
NASA's budget appropriation | r=0.98 | 9yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in Biological and biomedical sciences | r=0.98 | 9yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in Mathematics and statistics | r=0.98 | 9yrs | No |
Total comments on Mark Rober YouTube videos | r=0.98 | 9yrs | No |
Google searches for 'sushi near me' | r=0.97 | 9yrs | No |
Hispanic cheese consumption | r=0.97 | 9yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Amara | r=0.97 | 9yrs | No |
US per-person consumption of bottled water | r=0.96 | 9yrs | No |
Gender pay gap in the U.S. | r=0.96 | 9yrs | No |
Ford Motor Company's stock price (F) | r=-0.91 | 9yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Ghana also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)