Report an error
Wind power generated in Germany correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Google searches for 'how to learn python' | r=0.99 | 15yrs | No |
The distance between Neptune and Uranus | r=0.98 | 31yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on healthcare | r=0.97 | 22yrs | No |
Total NBA League Revenue | r=0.97 | 20yrs | Yes! |
The number of truck drivers in Florida | r=0.97 | 12yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Mathematics and statistics | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
PepsiCo's stock price (PEP) | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'this is fine' meme | r=0.95 | 16yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Gwendolyn | r=0.95 | 31yrs | No |
Butter consumption | r=0.95 | 31yrs | Yes! |
Wind power generated in Germany also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)