Report an error
Solar power generated in Ecuador correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Delta Airlines' stock price (DAL) | r=0.98 | 14yrs | No |
How provocative Simone Giertz's YouTube video titles are | r=0.98 | 8yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Raphael | r=0.96 | 17yrs | No |
Google searches for 'smol' | r=0.96 | 17yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'spurious correlations' | r=0.95 | 17yrs | No |
Google searches for 'cat memes' | r=0.93 | 17yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the 'pepe' meme | r=0.92 | 16yrs | No |
The average age of batters for the Chicago White Sox | r=-0.88 | 17yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Ecuador also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)