Report an error
Popularity of the first name Sebastian correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| The number of accountants and auditors in Texas | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
| Total number of automotive recalls | r=0.97 | 48yrs | No |
| Number of Lawyers in the United States | r=0.96 | 34yrs | No |
| Average milk produced per cow in the US | r=0.96 | 43yrs | No |
| Mozzarella cheese consumption | r=0.96 | 27yrs | No |
| Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.96 | 44yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Sebastian also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)