Report an error
Wind power generated in Czechia correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Number of Lawyers in the United States | r=0.98 | 22yrs | Yes! |
The distance between Saturn and the Sun | r=0.98 | 22yrs | No |
The distance between Saturn and Earth | r=0.98 | 22yrs | No |
Muenster cheese consumption | r=0.98 | 22yrs | No |
The distance between Saturn and Mercury | r=0.98 | 22yrs | No |
GMO use in corn grown in Ohio | r=0.97 | 18yrs | No |
Butter consumption | r=0.96 | 22yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'what is the FDIC' | r=0.95 | 18yrs | No |
Patents granted in the US | r=0.95 | 21yrs | Yes! |
Blue cheese consumption | r=0.89 | 22yrs | No |
Air quality in Grand Rapids, Michigan | r=0.86 | 22yrs | No |
The number of bill collectors in Kentucky | r=-0.9 | 19yrs | No |
Wind power generated in Czechia also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)