Report an error
Solar power generated in Czechia correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for Democratic Senators in Utah | r=0.99 | 6yrs | No |
The number of historians in Mississippi | r=0.97 | 17yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Liam | r=0.97 | 29yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Alice | r=0.97 | 29yrs | No |
Global plane crashes | r=0.96 | 29yrs | No |
Google searches for 'highest paying jobs' | r=0.96 | 18yrs | No |
Butter consumption | r=0.92 | 29yrs | Yes! |
The number of nursing instructors and teachers in Alabama | r=0.91 | 19yrs | No |
Votes for Democratic Senators in Pennsylvania | r=0.85 | 6yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Czechia also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)