Report an error
Solar power generated in China correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Total likes of Mark Rober YouTube videos | r=1 | 11yrs | No |
| Netflix's stock price (NFLX) | r=0.98 | 19yrs | No |
| Alphabet's stock price (GOOGL) | r=0.98 | 17yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Adonis | r=0.98 | 32yrs | Yes! |
| Intuitive Surgical's stock price (ISRG) | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
| Take-Two Interactive Software's stock price (TTWO) | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Sunny | r=0.96 | 32yrs | No |
| Sales of LP/Vinyl Albums | r=0.96 | 29yrs | No |
| Activision Blizzard's stock price (ATVI) | r=0.96 | 12yrs | No |
Solar power generated in China also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)