Report an error
Nuclear power generation in China correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Master's degrees awarded in Mathematics and statistics | r=1 | 10yrs | Yes! |
| The number of Breweries in the United States | r=0.99 | 30yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Beau | r=0.99 | 30yrs | Yes! |
| Popularity of the first name Theodore | r=0.99 | 30yrs | No |
| Average number of comments on Mark Rober YouTube videos | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
| Google's Advertising Revenue | r=0.98 | 21yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'avocado toast' | r=0.98 | 14yrs | No |
| McDonald's stock price (MCD) | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
| The number of statisticians in North Carolina | r=0.97 | 19yrs | No |
| American-type cheese consumption | r=0.97 | 27yrs | No |
| Global Puma Sales | r=0.96 | 16yrs | No |
| Microsoft's Worldwide Earnings | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
| Number of internet users | r=0.96 | 24yrs | No |
| American cheese consumption | r=0.95 | 30yrs | Yes! |
| Butter consumption | r=0.94 | 30yrs | Yes! |
Nuclear power generation in China also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)