Report an error
Renewable energy production in Burundi correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Google searches for 'cold shower' | r=0.96 | 18yrs | No |
Google searches for 'i am dizzy' | r=0.96 | 18yrs | No |
The number of medical assistants in New Mexico | r=0.95 | 19yrs | No |
Google searches for 'i have a headache' | r=0.94 | 18yrs | No |
McDonald's stock price (MCD) | r=0.93 | 20yrs | No |
The number of Breweries in the United States | r=0.93 | 32yrs | Yes! |
American Tower's stock price (AMT) | r=0.93 | 20yrs | No |
Annual Revenue of the Lego Group | r=0.91 | 19yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on medical supplies | r=0.91 | 22yrs | No |
Butter consumption | r=0.89 | 32yrs | Yes! |
The number of movies Tom Holland appeared in | r=0.88 | 10yrs | No |
Renewable energy production in Burundi also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)