Report an error
Biomass power generated in Brazil correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Henry | r=1 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Violet | r=0.99 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Liam | r=0.99 | 42yrs | No |
US household spending on healthcare | r=0.99 | 22yrs | No |
GMO use in corn grown in Kansas | r=0.99 | 22yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Esther | r=0.98 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Hadley | r=0.98 | 42yrs | No |
Butter consumption | r=0.95 | 32yrs | No |
Biomass power generated in Brazil also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)