Report an error
Fossil fuel use in Brazil correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Jayce | r=0.95 | 42yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'how to hide a body' | r=0.94 | 18yrs | No |
Patents granted in the US | r=0.92 | 41yrs | Yes! |
US Annual Tax Revenue | r=0.91 | 42yrs | Yes! |
Yogurt consumption | r=0.87 | 32yrs | No |
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.84 | 42yrs | Yes! |
Rain in Paris | r=0.8 | 16yrs | No |
Fossil fuel use in Brazil also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)