Report an error
Electricity generation in Bermuda correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Popularity of the first name Xavier | r=0.98 | 42yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Ivan | r=0.97 | 42yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Chloe | r=0.96 | 42yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Ashtyn | r=0.95 | 38yrs | No |
| Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nevada | r=0.95 | 11yrs | No |
| Asthma prevalence in American children | r=0.95 | 17yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Ethan | r=0.94 | 42yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Addie | r=0.94 | 42yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Isabelle | r=0.93 | 42yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Alexa | r=0.89 | 42yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Bermuda also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)