Report an error
Solar power generated in Belgium correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Average length of OverSimplified YouTube videos | r=1 | 6yrs | No |
Google searches for 'ice bath' | r=0.99 | 18yrs | Yes! |
Global Rice Consumption | r=0.98 | 13yrs | No |
Google searches for 'buy a house' | r=0.98 | 18yrs | No |
The number of epidemiologists in Colorado | r=0.97 | 16yrs | No |
Automotive recalls issued by Ford Motor Company | r=0.91 | 18yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Belgium also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)