Report an error
Solar power generated in Belarus correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Number of times 16 was a winning Mega Millions number | r=0.97 | 8yrs | No |
The number of fire inspectors in Iowa | r=0.94 | 6yrs | No |
The average age of batters for the Arizona Diamondbacks | r=0.92 | 8yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how to immigrate to switzerland' | r=0.85 | 8yrs | No |
Points scored by the San Francisco 49ers | r=0.82 | 8yrs | No |
Points allowed by the Kansas City Chiefs | r=0.74 | 8yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Belarus also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)