Report an error
Solar power generated in Austria correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Starbucks' stock price (SBUX) | r=0.99 | 20yrs | No |
| The Walt Disney Company's stock price (DIS) | r=0.99 | 20yrs | No |
| Sales of LP/Vinyl Albums | r=0.98 | 29yrs | No |
| Associates degrees awarded in gender studies | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Winter | r=0.97 | 29yrs | No |
| The number of Breweries in the United States | r=0.97 | 29yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'my cat scratched me' | r=0.97 | 14yrs | No |
| Abbott Laboratories' stock price (ABT) | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
| Votes for Democratic Senators in California | r=0.97 | 9yrs | Yes! |
| The number of musicians in Ohio | r=-0.89 | 19yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Austria also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)