Report an error
Geothermal power generated in Austria correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Cole | r=0.97 | 17yrs | No |
Arson in United States | r=0.97 | 17yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Taylor | r=0.96 | 17yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Tomas | r=0.96 | 17yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Joshua | r=0.95 | 17yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Shaniah | r=0.94 | 17yrs | No |
Robberies in the US | r=0.94 | 17yrs | Yes! |
Arson in Florida | r=0.93 | 17yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Mari | r=0.88 | 17yrs | No |
Mike Modano's regular season NHL goal assists | r=0.87 | 10yrs | No |
The number of cartographers in New York | r=0.86 | 16yrs | No |
Cleansheets Achieved by Golden Glove Winners in the English Premier League | r=0.79 | 14yrs | No |
Geothermal power generated in Austria also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)