Report an error
Renewable energy production in Australia correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
Microsoft's Worldwide Earnings | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
Google searches for 'cold shower' | r=0.97 | 18yrs | No |
The Walt Disney Company's stock price (DIS) | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
Google searches for 'i have a headache' | r=0.97 | 18yrs | No |
Google searches for 'what is my zodiac sign' | r=0.97 | 18yrs | No |
GMO use in cotton in California | r=0.97 | 22yrs | No |
Google searches for 'my cat scratched me' | r=0.96 | 14yrs | No |
McDonald's stock price (MCD) | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
Butter consumption | r=0.93 | 32yrs | No |
Renewable energy production in Australia also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)