Report an error
Solar power generated in Aruba correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
How provocative Simone Giertz's YouTube video titles are | r=0.98 | 8yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in journalism | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Franklin | r=0.96 | 12yrs | No |
Motor vehicle thefts in Montana | r=0.95 | 12yrs | No |
Google searches for 'spurious correlations' | r=0.95 | 12yrs | No |
The number of accountants and auditors in Illinois | r=0.94 | 12yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Laurel | r=0.92 | 12yrs | No |
The number of hotel managers in Maine | r=0.91 | 12yrs | No |
The number of movies Margot Robbie appeared in | r=0.76 | 12yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Aruba also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)