Report an error
Electricity generation in American Samoa correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Logan | r=0.97 | 42yrs | No |
Number of public school students in 9th grade | r=0.97 | 32yrs | No |
The distance between Uranus and Mercury | r=0.97 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Jack | r=0.96 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Isabelle | r=0.94 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Ashtyn | r=0.94 | 38yrs | No |
Google searches for 'where to buy bleach' | r=-0.86 | 18yrs | No |
Electricity generation in American Samoa also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)