Report an error
Total solar power generated globally correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Alphabet's stock price (GOOGL) | r=0.99 | 17yrs | No |
| Annual US household spending on home maintenance | r=0.98 | 22yrs | No |
| Associates degrees awarded in gender studies | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
| NIKE, Inc.'s stock price (NKE) | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
| Xcel Energy's stock price (XEL) | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
| Number of websites on the internet | r=0.97 | 28yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Sunny | r=0.97 | 39yrs | No |
| Netflix's stock price (NFLX) | r=0.97 | 19yrs | No |
| Vertex Pharmaceuticals' stock price (VRTX) | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
| Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA | r=0.96 | 39yrs | No |
| Google's Net Income | r=0.96 | 18yrs | No |
Total solar power generated globally also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)